DOI: https://doi.org/10.32515/2664-262X.2024.9(40).2.88-106

Statistical Analysis of Road Traffic Accidents in Ternopil Region and Measures for Reducing Accident Rates

Oleg Lyashuk, Dmytro Mironov, Serhii Lysenko, Andrii Hupka, Yurii Bodoriak

About the Authors

Oleg Lyashuk, Professor, Doctor in Technics (Doctor of Technic Sciences), Ivan Pulyuy Ternopil National Technical University, Ternopil, Ukraine, e-mail: oleglashuk@ukr.net, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4881-8568

Dmytro Mironov, Associate Professor, PhD in Technics (Candidate of Technics Sciences), Ivan Pulyuy Ternopil National Technical University, Ternopil, Ukraine, e-mail: mironov.epz@gmail.com, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5717-4322

Serhii Lysenko, Associate Professor, PhD in Technics (Candidate of Technics Sciences), Central ukrainian national technical university, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine, e-mail: sv07091976@gmail.com, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0845-7817

Andrii Gypka, Associate Professor, PhD in Technics (Candidate of Technics Sciences), Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University, Ternopil, Ukraine, е-mail : Gypkab@gmail.com, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7565-5664

Yurii Bodoriak, Research Forensic, Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Ternopil, Ukraine

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the dynamics, causes, and consequences of road traffic accidents (RTAs) in the Ternopil region over the past five years. This analysis seeks to identify the primary types of RTAs, determine the most frequent causes, and propose effective measures to reduce the number of accidents and their severity. By understanding these factors, we aim to enhance road safety and minimize the socio-economic impacts associated with RTAs in this region. In this study, a comprehensive statistical analysis of RTAs in the Ternopil region was conducted. This analysis revealed a significant increase in the number of accidents, which reached 2547 cases in 2023, an 11% rise compared to 2022. The primary types of accidents identified include collisions (50%), hitting obstacles (19%), hitting stationary vehicles (16%), and pedestrian accidents (8%). The study found that the highest mortality rates occur in pedestrian accidents (34%) and vehicle collisions (33%). Key causes of RTAs were identified as violations of maneuvering rules (40%), speeding (23%), failure to maintain a safe distance (10%), driving under the influence of alcohol (7%), and violations at intersections (5%). Based on these findings, several recommendations were made to enhance road safety. These include the implementation of artificial road bumps, installation of traffic lights with adjustable timers, additional road signs, high-visibility and illuminated pedestrian crossings, and the use of surveillance cameras to monitor compliance with traffic rules and identify violators. Moreover, the study emphasizes the importance of developing and implementing methodologies for predicting accident rates using statistical methods and conflict zone analysis, as well as calculating accident-related economic and environmental losses to evaluate the effectiveness of proposed measures. This study underscores the urgent need for improved road safety measures in the Ternopil region. Implementing the recommended strategies and methodologies will significantly reduce the number of RTAs, enhance overall road safety, decrease the risks of injuries and fatalities, and lower the economic costs associated with road traffic accidents. These findings provide a clear roadmap for policymakers and road safety authorities to take actionable steps towards a safer road environment.

Keywords

road traffic accidents (RTA), road safety, causes of RTAs, accident reduction, traffic injuries, traffic violations, accident prediction

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. Статистика ДТП в Україні. Патрульна поліція України. URL: https://patrolpolice.gov.ua/statystyka/ (дата звернення: 01.07.2024).

2. Оперативний звіт: демографічна статистика та географічний розподіл — опитування загального населення. Global Data Institute. URL: https://dtm.iom.int/reports/operativniy-zvit-demografichna-statistika-ta-geografichniy-rozpodil-opituvannya-zagalnogo (дата звернення: 01.07.2024).

3. Перелік автомобільних доріг Тернопільської області. Державне агентство відновлення та розвитку інфраструктури України. URL: https://te.restoration.gov.ua/vodiiam_ta_pereviznykam/perelik _avtomobilnykh _dorih_ternopilskoi_oblasti.html (дата звернення: 01.07.2024).

4. Статистична інформація у категорії Транспорт. Головне управління статистики у Тернопільській області. URL: https://www.te.ukrstat.gov.ua/statinfoTZ.html (дата звернення: 01.07.2024).

5. Про Правила дорожнього руху: Постанова Кабінету Міністрів України від 10 жовт. 2001 р. № 1306. Відомості Верховної Ради України. 2001. № 41. Ст. 1852.

6. Aulin V., Rogovskii I., Lyashuk O., et. al. Comprehensive assessment of technical condition of vehicles during operation based on Harrington’s desirability function. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2024. №1(3(127)). P. 37–46.

7. Скрипа Є.В. Щодо проблеми визначення поняття «дорожній рух». Підприємництво, господарство і право. 2019. № 2. С. 115–118.

8. Thomas Pyzdek. Pareto Analysis. Management for Professionals: The Lean Healthcare Handbook. 2021. №2(14). P. 157-164.

9. Салманова О.Ю. Адміністративно-правові засоби забезпечення міліцією безпеки дорожнього руху : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.07. Харків, 2002. 225 с.

10. Russo F., Vitetta A. Risk evaluation in a transportation system. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 2006. №1(2). P. 170–191.

11. Evans, A.W. Estimating transport fatality risk from accident data. Accident Analysis. 2003. №35. P. 459–472.

12. Ye F., Lord D. Investigation of effects of underreporting crash data on three commonly used traffic crash severity models: multinomial logit, ordered probit, and mixed logit. Transp Res Rec: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2011. №2241(1). P. 51-58.

13. Микитюк М.А. Владні повноваження Державної автомобільної інспекції Міністерства внутрішніх справ України: проблеми теорії та практики реалізації у сфері забезпечення безпеки дорожнього руху : дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.07. Київ, 2007. 208 с.

Citations

1. Statystyka DTP v Ukraini. Patrul'na politsiia Ukrainy [Statistics of Road Traffic Accidents in Ukraine. Patrol Police of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://patrolpolice.gov.ua/statystyka/ [in Ukrainian].

2. Operatyvnyj zvit: demohrafichna statystyka ta heohrafichnyj rozpodil — opytuvannia zahal'noho naselennia [Operational Report: Demographic Statistics and Geographical Distribution — General Population Survey]. Global Data Institute. Retrieved from: https://dtm.iom.int/reports/operativniy-zvit-demografichna-statistika-ta-geografichniy-rozpodil-opituvannya-zagalnogo (Last accessed: 01.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].

3. Perelik avtomobil'nykh dorih Ternopil's'koi oblasti. [List of Highways in the Ternopil Region]. Derzhavne ahentstvo vidnovlennia ta ro-zvytku infrastruktury Ukrainy - State Agency for Restoration and Development of Infrastructure of Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://te.restoration. gov.ua/vodiiam _ta_ pereviznykam/perelik_avtomobilnykh_dorih_ ternopilskoi_ oblasti.html (Last accessed: 01.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].

4. Statystychna informatsiia u katehorii Transport [Statistical Information in the Transport Category]. Holovne upravlinnia statystyky u Ternopil's'kij oblasti - Main Department of Statistics in the Ternopil Region. Retrieved from: https://www.te.ukrstat.gov.ua/statinfoTZ.html (Last accessed: 01.07.2024) [in Ukrainian].

5. Pro Pravyla dorozhn'oho rukhu: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy [On the Rules of the Road: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine] (2001) . Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy - Official Gazette of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 41, 1852 [in Ukrainian].

6. Aulin, V., Rogovskii, I., Lyashuk, O., et al. (2024). Comprehensive assessment of technical condition of vehicles during operation based on Harrington’s desirability function. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3(127)), 37–46.

7. Skrypa, Ye.V. (2019). Schodo problemy vyznachennia poniattia «dorozhnij rukh» [On the Problem of Defining the Concept of "Road Traffic"]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo - Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 2, 115–118 [in Ukrainian].

8. Pyzdek, T. (2021). Pareto Analysis. Management for Professionals: The Lean Healthcare Handbook, 2(14), 157-164.

9. Salmanova, O.Yu. (2002). Administratyvno-pravovi zasoby zabezpechennia militsiieiu bezpeky dorozhn'oho rukhu [Administrative and Legal Means of Ensuring Road Traffic Safety by the Police. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

10. Russo, F., Vitetta, A. (2006). Risk Evaluation in a Transportation System. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 1(2), 170–191.

11. Evans, A.W. (2003). Estimating Transport Fatality Risk from Accident Data. Accident Analysis, 35, 459–472.

12. Ye, F., Lord, D. (2011). Investigation of Effects of Underreporting Crash Data on Three Commonly Used Traffic Crash Severity Models: Multinomial Logit, Ordered Probit, and Mixed Logit. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2241(1), 51-58.

13. Mykytiuk, M.A. (2007). Vladni povnovazhennia Derzhavnoi avtomobil'noi inspektsii Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy: problemy teorii ta praktyky realizatsii u sferi zabezpechennia bezpeky dorozhn'oho rukhu [Authority Powers of the State Automobile Inspectorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine: Problems of Theory and Practice of Implementation in the Field of Road Traffic Safety]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Copyright (c) 2024 Oleg Lyashuk, Dmytro Mironov, Serhii Lysenko, Andrii Hupka, Yurii Bodoriak